Re: [EPP-discuss] Draft EPP Specification rev. 1.0 and invitation to meeting/workshop
On 26 okt 2012, at 11:11, Teddy Hogeborn <teddy.h+dk-epp_at_nmugroup.com> wrote:
> That's not RFC compliant. What you should do is something like this:
>
> <response>
> [...]
> <trID>
> <!-- This is just a suggestion -->
> <svTRID>DK-TRACKINGNO-1234</svTRID>
> </trID>
> <extension>
> <!-- This is what you REALLY should do -->
> <trackingno xmlns="urn:dk:dk-hostmaster:epp:dk-1.0">1234</trackingno>
> </extension>
> </response>
Exactly, thanks. I was sloppy in my response.
Extensions should be exactly like that, extensions. But I think we have made that pretty clear by now ;-)
Patrik
Received on Fri Oct 26 2012 - 15:15:51 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Feb 06 2015 - 11:39:05 CET