It seems that (all) other EPP implementations use the following convention:
<extension>
<contact-ext:create xmlns:contact-ext="
http://www.nominet.org.uk/epp/xml/contact-nom-ext-1.0">
<contact-ext:trad-name>Trading name</contact-ext:trad-name>
<contact-ext:type>LTD</contact-ext:type>
<contact-ext:co-no>12345678</contact-ext:co-no>
<contact-ext:opt-out>N</contact-ext:opt-out>
</contact-ext:create>
</extension>
<extension>
<lvcontact:create xmlns:lvcontact='
http://www.nic.lv/epp/schema/lvcontact-ext-1.0'>
<lvcontact:vatNr>LV12345678901</lvcontact:vatNr>
<lvcontact:regNr>12345678901</lvcontact:regNr>
</lvcontact:create>
</extension>
etc.
Whereas the current implementation (which differs from the documentation that describes extensions as above) seems to only accept the following:
<extension>
<dkhm:userType>individual</ext:userType>
<dkhm:CVR/>
<dkhm:EAN/>
</extension>
With the namespace specified in the <epp> tag.
Looking at the XSD schemas also seems to confirm that the create/update… tags have been removed.
Am I missing something?
If not, why did you change it from what seems to be the standard?
Mvh / Best regards
Morten Møller Riis
Gigahost ApS
mmr_at_gigahost.dk
Received on Tue Jun 04 2013 - 07:54:16 CEST